Skip to content

bazel build support for Android (bzlmod mode only)#12811

Open
jdcormie wants to merge 3 commits into
grpc:masterfrom
jdcormie:bazel-binder-3
Open

bazel build support for Android (bzlmod mode only)#12811
jdcormie wants to merge 3 commits into
grpc:masterfrom
jdcormie:bazel-binder-3

Conversation

@jdcormie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jdcormie jdcormie commented May 15, 2026

Makes //android and //binder available to external consumers of grpc-java via bazel/bzlmod/BCR.

errorprone checks on android code are now actually enforced, at the cost of longer kokoro/android.sh runtime.

WORKSPACE support is also possible but it ended up looking too hairy for me to put my name on.

@jdcormie jdcormie force-pushed the bazel-binder-3 branch 2 times, most recently from 63f127a to 856afb3 Compare May 15, 2026 06:30
@jdcormie jdcormie requested a review from Copilot May 15, 2026 06:33
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@jdcormie jdcormie force-pushed the bazel-binder-3 branch 11 times, most recently from 0673f1b to 6984b53 Compare May 18, 2026 23:41
jdcormie added 3 commits May 18, 2026 17:55
Add .bazelversion files so that workflows and contributors can
automatically use the same supported/tested version of bazel.

`examples/.bazelversion` could have been a symlink but decided against
this to avoid causing problems on Windows.
@jdcormie jdcormie changed the title binder: bazel build support (bzlmod mode only) bazel build support for Android (bzlmod mode only) May 19, 2026
@jdcormie jdcormie requested a review from Copilot May 19, 2026 02:09
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@jdcormie jdcormie marked this pull request as ready for review May 19, 2026 02:15
@jdcormie jdcormie requested a review from ejona86 May 19, 2026 02:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants